posted April 6, 2018 #
@yewknee @milesprice Okay I get it now
posted April 5, 2018 #
@forgetcassettes @yewknee @milesprice Lol beth
posted April 5, 2018 #
please let this mean the era of nostalgia saturation is over.
posted April 5, 2018 #
read through https://t.co/jEIKVsjVCo
posted April 5, 2018 #
@yewknee @BreakThruRadio @thejlm glad you're getting into them! check out my show tomorrow for an interview and more music from their label, @firetalkrecs ??
posted April 5, 2018 #
We are so super ecstatic to join our pals Pale Houses, Patrick Damphier, and Kyle Andrews at The High Watt on 4/20!!! Celebrating Pale Houses EP Release!!! https://t.co/UUJSjEbXf6
posted April 5, 2018 #
first new song released in six years
posted April 5, 2018 #
I said I’m sorry I’m just not comfortable posing doing air guitar. Or standing in front of a phone booth. And certainly I’m not jumping in the air. 20 minutes later: https://t.co/Tahl7mUmAE
posted April 5, 2018 #
I can't stop staring at the work of
Lan Truong, a Portland based illustrator with an obvious skill at texture. Occasionally the work reminds me of
Sam Smith or
Parra but it's clear that it's largely influenced by 60's and 70's styles and it
works.
The
official portfolio is augmented well by the
Instagram, which manages to show off a
bit of process (and a delightful
hamburger).
posted April 5, 2018 #
Look, I already did a post
about Facebook and some of my thoughts around all that. There's even some pleasant comments on the blog piece; proof that pleasant conversation can exist online. I don't disagree with the comments either - Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, etc are all helping to make advertising a more direct experience on the web. That's not a terribly bad thing on the whole.
All that is to say, please read this
Ezra Klein interview with Mark Zuckerberg. It's also a podcast if you want to hear it instead:
I've had this open in a tab for days as I make my way through it. I'm continuously bugged by this comment that Zuckerberg makes in response to Tim Cook about how an advertising business model forces a company not to "care" for its users (emphasis mine):
You know, I find that argument, that if you're not paying that somehow we can't care about you, to be extremely glib and not at all aligned with the truth. The reality here is that if you want to build a service that helps connect everyone in the world, then there are a lot of people who can't afford to pay. And therefore, as with a lot of media, having an advertising-supported model is the only rational model that can support building this service to reach people.
As for the take on advertising, great, fine, whatever. I'm impartial. However, the core goal of Facebook is "to build a service that helps connect everyone in the world" and I can't help but wonder, Why? #1, we already have the Internet. We're all already potentially connected. #2, having run a
small social network, I can promise you do
not want to connect everyone in the world.
I'm sure it's just marketing and PR speak from Zuckerberg but the idea that their goal is to connect everyone seems asinine. I'm not an isolationist and I'm all for the entire world becoming more aware and socially conscious - I just don't believe Facebook is the way to do it.